Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 kubetest: add flake attempts configuration to match upstream tests #2485

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2023

Conversation

chrischdi
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

Fixes the kubetest configuration for the upstream tests to match the upstream configuration.

Adds ginkgo.flake-attempts: 1.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
part of #2452

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 3, 2023
@chrischdi chrischdi changed the title kubetest: add flake attempts configuration to match upstream tests 🌱 kubetest: add flake attempts configuration to match upstream tests Nov 3, 2023
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 3, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e86f148) 63.58% compared to head (658ad11) 63.52%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2485      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.58%   63.52%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         123      123              
  Lines        8773     8773              
==========================================
- Hits         5578     5573       -5     
- Misses       2778     2783       +5     
  Partials      417      417              

see 5 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 3, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 94695c1c28fcfa898243baeb61b40f2f7d529cba

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 3, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 450b09f into kubernetes-sigs:main Nov 3, 2023
20 of 21 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.9 milestone Nov 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants